I'm losing my mind and I'm completely fine with that, or, a review of "S."

Often, the books I read are enjoyable just for the duration of the reading process. I’m not often terribly sad when a book ends because I feel satisfied with the story and with the characters, and after reading and replacing it on the shelf, it becomes a fond sort of memory. Very rarely does a story burrow its way into my life like S. has. I read this book from start to finish a total of five times to glean all the minutiae of the story within the novel, the footnotes, the four rounds of margin notes, and the clues and notes tucked into the spine, and still, I felt this frantic, obsessive need to know more. I Googled, I flipped through the book, I joined fan sites, and had vivid dreams with theories churning through my brain that woke me up in the early morning hours. I can’t stop. Not since I was nine years old and reading Harry Potter has something consumed me like this. And now, writing this review, I feel this profound need to express all my thoughts about it perfectly, because I truly don’t know what it is about S. that has me so completely enthralled. I want to claim it as mine, because it’s become so special to me. Why? 

Photo Mar 08, 7 50 56 PM
Yes, the book is beautiful as an object, and it’s perfectly executed down to the last detail: I mean, the effect is so convincing that the design includes printing the bleeding of the pen’s ink through the page. But the story itself is so rich and seems real: there is a shadowy, secret society called simply “The S” that may span centuries. There are a half dozen writers who were supposedly in The S and whose deeds include everything from assassinating the Archduke in 1914 to kidnapping Countess Olga. The whole “true story” of The S is presented in allegorical form in V.M. Straka’s last novel, The Ship of Theseus. The novel’s main character is a thinly veiled stand-in for Straka himself, whose identity nobody knows. And then there are Jen and Eric, two students who write to each other, meet, and fall in love within the margins of the book, trying to figure out the mysteries The S left for posterity, and finding themselves victims of a centuries-long struggle for power.

If you don’t know much about mythology, “the ship of Theseus” is a philosophical paradox: if you replace all the components of an object, does the object remain the same? This theme runs throughout the entire story-within-a-story-within-a-story and also raises the question of identity: the main character in the novel is an amnesiac. Is his previous life important? If everything about him has changed, who is he really? Does it matter? This theme also applies to the two “real” characters, Jen and Eric, who struggle with their post-grad identities and their futures.

The novel itself also freaking weird and mystical, often to an unbelievable degree that nevertheless is believable. There is a real “ship” and it’s crewed by men who have had their mouths sewn shut. Time on the ship occurs ten times more quickly than time on land. Often, dialogue between characters happens inside the mind, with no concrete explanation. It’s up to the reader to figure out the allegorical/metaphorical meaning of many of the events in the novel, which means solving the mystery yourself, without the “help” of Jen and Eric. In that way, the reader becomes an integral part of the story, placing you within the narrative and thus creating another, entirely different layer of story that is unique to each reader. My theories and conclusions may not be shared by anyone else. But I think I’m right. 😉

But the story doesn’t even stop after you’ve analyzed every page. Doug Dorst and JJ Abrams also created several websites that tie-in with the book and which also serve as clues for those eager (like me!) to continue the story and learn everything the book leaves ambiguous (which is a lot). There are Twitter accounts for Jen and Eric, events alluded to after the timeline of the book ends, a radio station called “Radio Straka” with vague clues and shadowy dealings, and photographs released by the authors to the fans. Fansites treat S. with reverence and obsession, treating the whole story as if it’s real—because it feels so real. I think that’s why I’ve become so obsessed. I think that’s why stories have such power.

S. pushes the boundaries of what a novel is, raises huge expectations about the story’s value, invites critics who dismiss it as gimmicky, and yet, it has exceeded all of my wildest expectations and has, I think, set a new precedent for what a book is capable of achieving. This nested narrative leaps off the page, literally. The clues and paraphernalia tucked within the pages are necessary, and make the experience that much more immersive and vividly real. This book is why I love books, and why artists should be innovative and push boundaries and do anything to tell a good story. This book should be studied and parsed and emulated. It’s done something so profound and rare: it’s become truly real in my eyes.

image links to source.

Share...Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on TumblrEmail this to someone
  • Sounds fascinating, thanks for the review/recommendation! *rushes to Amazon* 🙂 x

  • Wow! I love how “real” and interactive they’ve made it. I need to read this!

    • Yes! Please do! I want everyone to read this book and then talk about it with me so I can indulge my crazy. 😉

  • Kayla

    Just finished it and now I’m googling everything I can to research further and pick others’ brains. And I too felt a pang of sadness when it was finished. I’m already thinking about how I want to go about reading it a second time. loved your thoughts on reading S/SOT. beautifully said!

    • Yes!! I wonder if you’re thinking what I’m thinking…

      • Kayla

        did you notice in chapter 2, the playfair cipher mentioned under FN 2, that Jen decodes it just as LOOPER AGENT… BUT I did decoded it myself, and also had a website do it, and both come out to LOOPER AGENT X. I don’t know if authors intentionally left that in the margin notes, oor if I’m wrong but it feels like it means something…since the latter 2 word/letter is the title of chapter 4 and also who S is supposed to be in the picture caption after the bombing, along with Corbeau, and Stenfolk, who are named. And the “agents” come into play later on in the interlude, when S is taking them out.

        • Well agent x is S and S is basically Straka…!

          • Kayla

            I agree that S is most likely supposed to be Straka.

            I guess I just found it interesting that Jen didn’t translate it as Looper Agent X.

            if it’s supposed to be that – what’s the connection between S being agent x and looper being agent x? One could conclude that that would make S = Looper. so if S is straka and s is looper, then straka is looper? Why would FXC warn that Looper is Agent X if they are all the same person?

            UNLESS, she was trying to hint that she figured him out. That Looper was just a made up persona for Straka, and the only man that identified Looper also knew Vaclav, and maybe Looper and Vaclav were the same….Vaclav was Straka and Vaclav was Looper. Vaclav “ended at the water” when he jumped off the bridge and “began again” as Straka/Looper/S. AND FXC is like I KNOOOOWWW

            One theory suggested S and Vevoda are the same person…but I’m not sure I buy that.

          • We don’t know that much about Looper at all! That makes me suspicious. I personally think that Vaclav is Straka because it just seems so obvious to me based on all of the clues Jen and Eric solved in the book, so maybe Looper was an alter ego to sever that connection between Vaclav Straka and VM Straka.

  • Kayla

    ” so maybe Looper was an alter ego to sever that connection between Vaclav Straka and VM Straka. ”

    yup. I think that’s why there was so little about him/everything about him is unconfirmed. VMS/Vaclav made him up.

    but then Looper “disappeared” when Rybarik ID’ed him. I wonder what Rybarik was institutionalized for. Maybe he was going around saying he was seeing a dead man! maybe VMS had something to do with that, desperate to hide his identity.

    I like how the EVOTVOS Wheel site puts it, under the Looper as a candidate bio: “If so, it’s more likely that Straka was Looper than that Looper was Straka.”

  • Pingback: How Will People Read Books 20 Years from Now?()